The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance announced on Aug. 14, 2026, that it will permanently stop responding to no-action requests under Rule 14a-8. The rule governs when shareholders may place proposals on a company's proxy ballot and when companies may exclude them.
No-action letters were nonbinding responses in which SEC staff indicated whether it would object if a company omitted a shareholder proposal from its ballot. The change makes permanent a pause the division first announced Nov. 17, 2025, which had applied only to the 2025-26 proxy season (Oct. 1, 2025-Sept. 30, 2026).
The new policy also goes further than the temporary one. The division will now decline all no-action requests, including exclusion requests under Rule 14a-8(i)(1), a narrow category it had continued to review during the pause. It will also stop sending no-objection letters in response to companies' Rule 14a-8(j) exclusion notices.
The division said it made the change "in order to focus Division resources on the review of Securities Act and Exchange Act filings, including those reviews that are statutorily required, for the protection of investors and facilitation of capital formation."
Companies must still notify the SEC when excluding a proposal, using the agency's online Shareholder Proposal Form.
The permanent change ends the SEC's informal referee role in shareholder proposal disputes, many of which involve environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics like emissions or workforce diversity. Without that guidance, companies and shareholder proponents will lean more on negotiation, existing SEC guidance, and litigation to resolve disagreements.
In July 2026, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said that "Nearly eight months later, it is clear that neither of these dire predictions materialized" — referring to fears that companies would broadly exclude proposals or that litigation would spike. A count by Freshfields found that 66% of known shareholder proposals were placed on proxies as of June 15, 2026, up from 59% a year earlier, supporting Atkins' assessment.
The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, an investor coalition focused on corporate social responsibility that opposes the SEC's decision, criticized the change. The group's senior policy advisor, Tim Smith, said, "Instead of having the SEC operate as an informal referee, now investors will be forced to consider other options if a company decides to unilaterally omit a resolution with inadequate arguments."
The Division of Corporation Finance announced the suspension in November 2025, citing staff resource constraints and the guidance already available from previous proxy seasons. The SEC said the policy would apply only to the 2025-26 proxy season while it evaluated the process.
A mid-season analysis by Glass Lewis, a proxy advisory firm, found that companies were excluding significantly fewer shareholder proposals in 2026 despite the SEC's reduced role in the process.
On March 19, 2026, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and As You Sow, a shareholder advocacy nonprofit, sued the SEC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The groups said the agency changed how Rule 14a-8 operates without following the Administrative Procedure Act's rulemaking requirements. The lawsuit remains pending.
Ballotpedia tracks support for and opposition to the environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) investing movement. To learn more about arguments for, against, and about ESG, click here. For more information on reform proposals related to ESG policy, click here.
Additional reading: