Author: Jon Dunn

  • Exxon sues California over new climate disclosure laws

    Posted on

    The European Parliament voted on Oct. 22, 2025, to reject a proposal that would have simplified the European Union’s (EU) sustainability reporting and due diligence rules. The bill sought to narrow company-size thresholds and reduce specific disclosure requirements under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Opponents of the…

  • Regulators withdraw climate-risk principles for large banks

    Posted on

    On Oct. 9, the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced they will withdraw the Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions. The principles were issued in 2023 to help large banks assess and manage climate-related financial risks. The agencies said they “do not believe principles for managing climate-related financial…

  • EU to delay sustainability reporting for non-EU companies

    Posted on

    The European Union (EU) will postpone its requirement that non-EU companies adopt upcoming sustainability-reporting standards under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The delay, part of the Omnibus I reform package the European Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee approved on October 9, 2025, would move the compliance date from June 2026 until at least October 2027.…

  • California identifies more than 4,000 companies subject to emissions reporting

    Posted on

    In this week’s edition of Economy and Society: Around the world ESG funds drive defense sector boom in Europe What’s the story? European defense and aerospace stocks have risen about 300% since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, according to the Financial Times. ESG investment funds—once reluctant to include weapons makers—are now a major factor in…

  • Overview of implications for the administrative state in decisions from the 2024-25 Supreme Court term

    Posted on

    What’s the story? The U.S. Supreme Court ended its October 2024 term on June 27, 2025, with a series of rulings on the administrative state. The Court issued 13 decisions that affected federal agency operations and oversight. The most notable opinions from the term included decisions: SCOTUS also clarified constitutional boundaries on agency appointments, declined…

  • Overview of federalism implications in decisions from the 2024-25 Supreme Court term

    Posted on

    Image of the front of the United States Supreme Court building

    What’s the story? During the 2024 term, which ended on June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several decisions that affected the balance of federalism, altering how authority is shared between states and the federal government. The rulings focused less on policy outcomes and more on procedural rules, addressing disputes over the proper use…

  • Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions in Trump v. CASA, Inc.

    Posted on

    The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. on June 27, holding that federal district courts exceeded their authority by issuing universal injunctions—orders that block a federal policy nationwide, not just for the parties in the case. The Court did not decide the constitutionality of the underlying executive order concerning…

  • Supreme Court hears case on nationwide injunctions tied to birthright citizenship order

    Posted on

    What happened? The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments May 15 in Trump v. CASA, Inc., a case challenging President Donald Trump’s (R) executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The case was consolidated with Trump v. Washington and Trump v. New Jersey, in which four and 18 states, respectively, filed lawsuits against the administration. The legal…