TagFederal Courts

Tag for anything regarding federal courts

Trump has appointed second-most federal judges through April 1 of a president’s fourth year

Donald Trump has appointed and the Senate confirmed 193 Article III federal judges through April 1, 2020, his fourth year in office. This is the second-most Article III judicial appointments through this point in all presidencies since Jimmy Carter (D). The Senate had confirmed 207 of Carter’s appointees at this point in his term.

The average number of federal judges appointed by a president through April 1 of their fourth year in office is 168.

The median number of Supreme Court justices appointed is two. Along with President Trump, Presidents Barack Obama (D), Bill Clinton (D), and George H.W. Bush (R) had each appointed two Supreme Court justices at this point in their first terms. Ronald Reagan (R) had appointed one, while Carter and George W. Bush (R) had not appointed any.

The median number of United States Court of Appeals appointees is 30. Trump appointed the most with 51, while Reagan appointed the least with 25. Trump’s 51 appointments make up 28% of the total 179 judgeships across the courts of appeal.

The median number of United States District Court appointees is 138. Carter appointed the most with 157, and Reagan appointed the fewest with 103. Trump has appointed 138 district court judges so far. Those appointments make up 20% of the 677 judgeships across the district courts.

Article III federal judges are appointed for life terms by the president of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate per Article III of the United States Constitution. Article III judges include judges on the: Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. courts of appeal, U.S. district courts, and the Court of International Trade.

Additional reading:


President Trump announces nominee for only open U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals vacancy

On March 30, President Donald Trump (R) announced his intent to nominate Judge Cory Wilson to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. Wilson was previously nominated to a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. He had a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on January 8 but has not been voted out of committee as of the new appointment.

Currently, Judge E. Grady Jolly’s former seat on the 5th Circuit is the only vacancy on a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal. Jolly assumed senior status on October 3, 2017. The last time this occurred was in July 1984, when Judge John Butzner’s seat on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals was the only vacancy.

Wilson is a judge on the Mississippi Court of Appeals. He joined the court in 2019 after being appointed by Governor Phil Bryant (R). Before joining the state court of appeals, Wilson was a Republican representative of District 73 in the Mississippi House of Representatives.

Wilson graduated summa cum laude with a bachelor’s of business administration (B.B.A.) from the University of Mississippi in 1992. He received his J.D. from Yale Law School in 1995. During his legal studies, Wilson served on the Yale Law Journal.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit is one of 13 U.S. courts of appeal. They are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal courts. The 5th Circuit has jurisdiction over the U.S. District Courts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.

The court has 17 authorized posts. Eleven of the 16 current judges were appointed by Republican presidents. Five judges were appointed by Democratic presidents. President Trump nominated five of the 16 current judges.

There are two upcoming Court of Appeals vacancies. Andrew Brasher was already confirmed to succeed Judge Ed Carnes on the 11th Circuit. Carnes is expected to assume senior status on June 30. Judge Thomas Griffith announced he would retire from the District of Columbia Circuit on September 1. There is no nominee pending for Griffith’s seat.

Additional reading:


Fifth Circuit upholds limits on presidential removal power over CFPB head

A panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided 2-1 to uphold the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The court’s March 3 opinion said that the legal restrictions on the president’s authority to remove the head of the agency were “valid and constitutional.”

Judge Stephen Higginson, an Obama appointee, delivered the opinion of the court, saying that “neither the text of the Constitution nor the Supreme Court’s previous decisions” support the argument that the CFPB has an unconstitutional structure.

Judge Patrick Higginbotham, a Reagan appointee, wrote a concurring opinion joined by Higginson, arguing that the president may still exert authority over the CFPB through the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which can veto CFPB rules. He said that the U.S. Supreme Court has approved presidential removal power restrictions similar to those protecting the head of the CFPB.

Judge Jerry Edwin Smith, a Reagan appointee, filed a dissenting opinion, arguing that recent Fifth Circuit precedent suggested that the structure of the CFPB was unconstitutional.

The appointment and removal power refers to the authority of an executive to appoint and remove officials in the various branches. The Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution vests the president with the authority to appoint officers of the United States, including federal judges, ambassadors, and Cabinet-level department heads. The president has the authority to remove his appointees from office, but the heads of independent federal agencies can only be removed for cause.

The Fifth Circuit published its decision on the same day the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in another case challenging the structure of the CFPB,  Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. A U.S. Supreme Court decision that the U.S. Constitution forbids protecting the director of the CFPB from presidential removal might give the president more control of other leaders of independent administrative agencies. Also, CFPB decisions made under a director with removal protections might become invalid following the ruling.

Click here to read the Fifth Circuit decision and here to learn more about Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Additional reading:


D.C. Circuit rules against HHS approval of Arkansas Medicaid work requirements

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled against an attempt to allow Arkansas to institute work requirements for Medicaid recipients.

On February 14, 2020, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit ruled in Gresham v. Azar that Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Alex Azar, failed the arbitrary-or-capricious test when he approved a request from Arkansas to require its Medicaid beneficiaries to work at least 80 hours per month.

The court held that Azar was wrong not to consider whether the Arkansas work requirements would prevent some people from receiving health care coverage. The court held that Congress intended Medicaid to provide health care coverage and that HHS must uphold that purpose when approving state coverage plans.

The Trump administration announced in January 2018 that it would allow states to implement work requirements for Medicaid recipients by obtaining waivers from HHS. Arkansas, Kentucky, and New Hampshire received waivers, but Judge James Boasberg of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia blocked them from going into effect. The D.C. Circuit decision in _Gresham_ followed an appeal of Boasberg’s ruling filed by Arkansas.

The judges on the D.C. Circuit panel were Cornelia Pillard, an Obama appointee, Edwards, a Carter appointee, and David Sentelle, a Reagan appointee. Judge Sentelle filed the opinion for the court.

To learn more about the APA or the arbitrary-or-capricious test, see here:
Administrative Procedure Act
Arbitrary-or-capricious test

Additional reading:
Alex Azar 
Medicaid
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 
James Boasberg
United States District Court for the District of Columbia 

Link to the D.C. Circuit opinion: https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/19-5094.pdf



U.S. Senate confirms nominee to District Court of Puerto Rico

Photo credit: Andrew Shiva / Wikipedia

The U.S. Senate has confirmed Silvia Carreño-Coll to the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico on a 96-0 vote. Overall, the Senate has confirmed 193 of President Trump’s judicial nominees—138 district court judges, 51 appeals court judges, two Court of International Trade judges, and two Supreme Court justices.

Carreño-Coll was a federal magistrate judge for the District of Puerto Rico from 2011 to 2020. Before that, she was associate regional counsel in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Caribbean Environmental Protection Division (1995-2011), an assistant U.S. attorney in the District of Puerto Rico (1989-1995), and an attorney in the Puerto Rico Department of Justice (1986-1989). Carreño-Coll earned her B.A., cum laude, from Emerson College in 1983 and her J.D., cum laude, from the University of Puerto Rico School of Law in 1986.

Carreño-Coll succeeded Judge Jay Garia-Gregory, who assumed senior status on September 30, 2018. After Carreño-Coll received commission, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico had five Republican-appointed judges, two Democrat-appointed judges, and no vacancies.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico is one of 94 U.S. District Courts. They are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system.

Click here to learn more about Silvia Carreno-Coll

Additional reading:
United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
United States District Court
Federal judicial appointments by president
Federal judges nominated by Donald Trump



Senate confirms four district court nominees; Trump appointments reach 192

The U.S. Senate confirmed four nominees to U.S. District Court judgeships. The Senate has confirmed 192 of President Trump’s Article III judicial nominees—two Supreme Court justices, 51 appellate court judges, 137 district court judges, and two U.S. Court of International Trade judges—since January 2017.

The confirmed nominees are:

  • Philip Halpern, confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Halpern was confirmed on a 77-19 vote. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), one of Halpern’s home-state senators, voted against his confirmation. After Halpern receives his judicial commission and takes his judicial oath, the court will have three vacancies, 19 Democrat-appointed judges, and six Republican-appointed judges.
  • John Kness, confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Kness was confirmed on an 81-12 vote. After he receives his judicial commission and takes his judicial oath, the court will have two vacancies, 13 Democrat-appointed judges, and seven Republican-appointed judges.
  • Matthew Schelp, confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Schelp was confirmed on a vote of 72-23. After he receives his judicial commission and takes his judicial oath, the court will have no vacancies, five Democrat-appointed judges, and four Republican-appointed judges.
  • Joshua Kindred, confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska. Kindred was confirmed on a 54-41 vote where Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona joined 52 Republicans to confirm the nominee. After he receives his judicial commission and takes his judicial oath, the court will have no vacancies, one Democrat-appointed judge, and two Republican-appointed judges.

There are 94 U.S. District Courts. They are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system.

Click here to learn more.

Additional reading:



President Trump announces intent to nominate two Article III judgeships in New York

On February 12, 2020, President Donald Trump (R) announced his intent to nominate Jennifer Rearden to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and Saritha Komatireddy to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Following nomination by the president, a federal judicial nominee completes a questionnaire that is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The committee then holds a hearing to question the nominee regarding their judicial philosophy and their previous rulings. The committee also sends the nominee’s home state senators a blue slip, permitting them to express their approval or disapproval of the nominee.

After the hearing, the committee votes to approve or return the nominee. If approved, the nominee is reported to the full Senate for a vote. If returned, the president may renominate the person. If the Senate confirms the nomination, the individual receives commission to serve as a federal judge for a life term. If the individual is not confirmed, they do not become a judge.

The U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York are two of 94 U.S. District Courts. They are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system.

The president has announced 245 Article III judicial nominations since taking office on January 20, 2017. The president named 69 judicial nominees in 2017 and 92 in 2018.

Click here to learn more.

Additional reading:

 



Senate confirms sixth Trump nominee to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals

The U.S. Senate has confirmed Andrew Brasher to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on a 52-43 vote. Overall, the Senate has confirmed 188 of President Trump’s Article III judicial nominees—two Supreme Court justices, 51 appellate court judges, 133 district court judges, and two U.S. Court of International Trade judges—since January 2017. Brasher is the first Article III judge the Senate has confirmed in 2020.

Brasher is a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. President Trump nominated Brasher to that court in 2018 and he was confirmed in 2019. From 2014 to 2019, Brasher was the solicitor general of Alabama. He received his B.A., summa cum laude, from Samford University in 2002 and his J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 2006. Brasher was a member of the Harvard Law Review from 2004 to 2006.

Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.) voted against Brasher’s confirmation to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) voted in favor of the confirmation. Jones and Shelby are the U.S. senators from Brasher’s home state.

When Brasher receives commission, he will succeed Judge Ed Carnes, who will assume senior status upon Brasher’s swearing-in. At that time, the court will have no vacancies, seven Republican-appointed judges, and five Democrat-appointed judges.

The 11th Circuit was the third appellate court to change from a majority of Democrat-appointed judges to Republican-appointed judges since President Trump took office. The change took place when Judges Robert Luck and Barbara Lagoa received commission. The 2nd and 3rd Circuits also changed from majority Democrat-appointed to majority Republican-appointed judges during the Trump administration.

There are 13 U.S. courts of appeal. They are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal court system.

Additional reading:
United States Court of Appeal  for the 11th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Federal judicial appointments by president 
Federal judges nominated by Donald Trump



Ballotpedia releases federal judicial vacancy count for January

In this month’s federal judicial vacancy count, Ballotpedia tracked nominations, confirmations, and vacancies from January 3, 2020, to February 3, 2020. Ballotpedia publishes the federal judicial vacancy count at the start of each month.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Vacancies: There have been three new judicial vacancies since the December 2019 report. There are 75 vacancies out of 870 active Article III judicial positions on courts covered in this report. Including the United States Court of Federal Claims and the United States territorial courts, 81 of 890 active federal judicial positions are vacant.
  • Nominations: There has been one new nomination since the December 2019 report.
  • Confirmations: There have not been any new confirmations since the December 2019 report.
New vacancies 

There were 75 vacancies out of 870 active Article III judicial positions, a total vacancy percentage of 8.6, which is .3 percentage points higher than the vacancy percentage in December 2019.

  • The nine-member U.S. Supreme Court does not have any vacancies.
  • One (0.6%) of the 179 U.S. Appeals Court positions are vacant.
  • 72 (10.6%) of the 677 U.S. District Court positions are vacant.
  • Two (22.2%) of the nine U.S. Court of International Trade positions are vacant.

A vacancy occurs when a judge resigns, retires, takes senior status, or passes away. Article III judges, who serve on courts authorized by Article III of the Constitution, are appointed for life terms.

Three judges left active status, creating Article III life-term judicial vacancies. As Article III judicial positions, these vacancies must be filled by a nomination from the president. Nominations are subject to confirmation on the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.

  • Judge Christopher Boyko assumed senior status on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
  • Judge Dora Irizarry assumed senior status on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
  • Judge Lawrence O’Neill assumed senior status on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
U.S. Court of Appeals vacancies

The following chart tracks the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals from the inauguration of President Donald Trump (R) to the date indicated on the chart.

The following maps show the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals at the inauguration of President Donald Trump (R) and as of February 3, 2020.

New nominations

President Donald Trump (R) has announced one new nomination since the December 2019 report.

  • Drew Tipton, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Since taking office in January 2017, President Trump has nominated 239 individuals to Article III positions.

New confirmations

Since January 3, 2020, the United States Senate did not confirm any of President Trump’s nominees to Article III seats. As of February 3, 2020, the Senate has confirmed 187 of President Trump’s judicial nominees—133 district court judges, 50 appeals court judges, two Court of International Trade judges, and two Supreme Court justices—since January 2017.

Click here to learn more.

Additional reading:


No Article III federal judges confirmed in January; Trump has appointed second-most through third year of a presidency

Donald Trump appointed and the Senate confirmed 187 Article III federal judges through February 1, 2020, his fourth year in office. This is the second-most Article III judicial appointments through this point in a presidency of all presidents dating back to Theodore Roosevelt. Only Jimmy Carter (197) had more.

The average number of federal judges appointed by a president at the end of their third year in office is 99.

The median number of Supreme Court justices appointed is two. William Taft’s (R) five appointments were the most among this set. Presidents Franklin Roosevelt (D), Jimmy Carter (D), and George W. Bush (R) did not appoint any justices through at the end of their third years in office. Trump has appointed 2 justices so far.

The median number of United States Court of Appeals appointees is 19. Trump appointed the most with 50, and Presidents Woodrow Wilson (D) and Warren Harding (R) appointed the fewest with six. Trump’s 50 appointments make up 28 percent of the total 179 judgeships across the courts of appeal.The median number of United States District Court appointees is 67. Bill Clinton (D) appointed the most with 151, and President Theodore Roosevelt (R) appointed the fewest with 14. Trump has appointed 133 district court judges so far. Those appointments make up 20 percent of the 677 judgeships across the district courts.

Article III federal judges are appointed for life terms by the president of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate per Article III of the United States Constitution. Article III judges include judges on the: Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. courts of appeal, U.S. district courts, and the Court of International Trade.

Click here to learn more about federal judicial appointments by president.
Click here to learn more about judges appointed by Pres. Donald Trump.


Bitnami