We #SCOTUS and you can, too!
Last week, SCOTUS held its final argument session of the term, hearing an hour of oral argument in one case during a rare May sitting.
During the 2019-2020 term, the Supreme Court heard 10 hours of oral argument in 13 cases during its May argument session. Those cases had been postponed from earlier sittings due to public health recommendations in response to COVID-19. According to SCOTUSblog, the last time the Supreme Court held a full May sitting was during its October 1968 term.
Here’s a breakdown of the hours of oral argument the court heard during each of this term’s argument sessions:
Twelve of the cases heard this term were originally scheduled for the 2019-2020 term but were delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic. Five cases were removed from the argument calendar. Seven cases were decided without argument.
Looking ahead, SCOTUS has accepted 14 cases to its merits docket for the 2021 October Term. Argument dates in those cases are currently pending.
SCOTUS has not accepted any new cases since our May 3 issue.
SCOTUS has not issued any opinions in cases since our May 3 issue.
Upcoming SCOTUS dates
Here are the court’s upcoming dates of interest:
- May 13: SCOTUS will conference. A conference is a private meeting of the justices.
- May 17: SCOTUS will release orders.
- May 20: SCOTUS will conference.
- May 24: SCOTUS will release orders.
- May 27: SCOTUS will conference.
True or false: In order to be a Supreme Court justice, one must be a lawyer or a law school graduate.
Choose an answer to find out!
The Federal Vacancy Count
The Federal Vacancy Count tracks vacancies, nominations, and confirmations to all United States Article III federal courts in a one-month period. This month’s edition includes nominations, confirmations, and vacancies from April 1 to May 1.
- Vacancies: There have been six new judicial vacancies since the March 2021 report. There are 76 vacancies out of 870 active Article III judicial positions on courts covered in this report. Including the United States Court of Federal Claims and the United States territorial courts, 79 of 890 active federal judicial positions are vacant.
- Nominations: There were 3 new nominations since the March 2021 report.
- Confirmations: There have been no new confirmations since the March 2021 report.
Vacancy count for May 1, 2021
A breakdown of the vacancies at each level can be found in the table below. For a more detailed look at the vacancies on the federal courts, click here.
*Though the United States territorial courts are named as district courts, they are not Article III courts. They are created in accordance with the power granted under Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. Click here for more information.
Six judges left active status, creating Article III life-term judicial vacancies, since the previous vacancy count. As Article III judicial positions, the president nominates individuals to fill the vacancies. Nominations are subject to U.S. Senate confirmation.
- Judge Catherine Blake assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.
- Judge Emmet Sullivan assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
- Judge Amy Totenberg assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
- Judge Timothy Stanceu assumed senior status on the U.S. Court of International Trade.
- Judge Colleen McMahon assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
- Judge George Daniels assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The following chart tracks the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals from the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) to the date indicated on the chart.
U.S. District Court vacancies
The following map shows the number of vacancies in the United States District Courts as of May 1, 2021.
President Joe Biden (D) announced three new nominations since the March 2021 report.
- Christine O’Hearn, to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
- David G. Estudillo, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
- Tana Lin, to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
As of May 1, 2021, there have been no federal judicial confirmations during the Biden administration.
As of May 1 of the first year of President Donald Trump’s (R) presidency, the U.S. Senate had confirmed one of Trump’s Article III judicial nominees–U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Need a daily fix of judicial nomination, confirmation, and vacancy information? Click here for continuing updates on the status of all federal judicial nominees.
Or, keep an eye on our list for updates on federal judicial nominations.
Spotlight: Presidential nominations to federal courts
Through the sands of time, some bead curtains, and hopefully some Motown records, the time has come today! We continue our time-journey by stopping over at an era known as November 1963 through January 1969. Today’s edition of Bold Justice highlights President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s (D) federal judicial nominees.
While serving in the White House, President Johnson nominated 180 individuals to Article III judgeships who were confirmed to the bench. Among the most notable appointees were Supreme Court Justices Abe Fortas and Thurgood Marshall. Fortas was nominated and commissioned in 1965. Marshall was nominated and commissioned in 1967.
President Johnson made his first successful Article III appointments by April 1 of his first year in office–three nominees were confirmed to U.S. district courts. By the end of his first year in office, 21 of Johnson’s nominees had been confirmed. Throughout his tenure as president, Johnson averaged 34.1 judicial appointments per year. For comparison, President Jimmy Carter (D) had the highest average from 1901 to 2021 with 65.5 appointments per year.
Of his Article III appointees–not including Supreme Court nominations–President Johnson appointed 44 judges to the United States Courts of Appeal, 126 judges to U.S. district courts, and eight judges to the U.S. Court of International Trade.
We’ll be back on June 7 with a new edition of Bold Justice. Until then, gaveling out!
Kate Carsella compiled and edited this newsletter, with contributions from Brittony Maag, Jace Lington, and Sara Reynolds.