Hall Pass: Your Ticket to Understanding School Board Politics, Edition #75

Welcome to Hall Pass, a newsletter written to keep you plugged into the conversations driving school board politics and governance.

In today’s edition, you’ll find:

  • On the issues: The debate over universal government-funded school meals  
  • School board filing deadlines, election results, and recall certifications
  • Oklahoma State Board of Education votes to upgrade Tulsa Public Schools’ accreditation status following superintendent resignation
  • Stay up to date with responses to trends in curriculum development
  • Extracurricular: education news from around the web
  • Candidate Connection survey
  • School board candidates per seat up for election

Email us at editor@ballotpedia.org to share reactions or story ideas!

On the issues: The debate over universal government-funded school meals

In this section, we curate reporting, analysis, and commentary on the issues school board members deliberate when they set out to offer the best education possible in their district.

Eligibility for government-funded free or reduced-price school meals is typically tied to family income, with students from low-income families receiving the most generous subsidies. But should all students have access to government-funded meals? 

Allison Pfaff Harris writes in the affirmative. Harris says expanding eligibility would reduce administrative costs associated with processing applications from families seeking school meal assistance. She also says applications create barriers that prevent some children from receiving needed food. 

Max Eden writes that government-funded lunches should not be universally available. Eden says it is better for parents to feed their children if they are able and that universal school meals would stigmatize the practice of packing lunch. He also says government-funded meals train children to rely on the government.  

Barrier to free school meals hurts students | Allison Pfaff Harris, The Cap Times

“A requirement for participation is providing all households the opportunity to fill out a free and reduced price meal application. Students from households with incomes below certain thresholds receive school meals either for free or at a reduced price. This requires school nutrition professionals to prioritize the free and reduced meal application to first ensure all students have access to meals, in itself a time-consuming and emotionally draining task. From addressing questions and comprehension barriers to convincing a household that their income information would remain confidential because the household was too proud or concerned that others in their community would know they were struggling financially  — a storyline I heard all too often throughout the state — the application creates a barrier for students in achieving their full potential. And not simply their academic potential while in K-12 school, but throughout life. Access to nourishing school meals during the school day means improved focus in the classroom, opening the door for future employment, educational, and professional opportunities, and nurturing healthy family, social and community relationships.”

The Case Against Universal Free Lunch | Max Eden, American Enterprise Institute

“There is a strong case for governmental provision of food to children whose parents can’t—or won’t—feed them. But that’s not the question at hand. The question is whether the government should feed children whose parents can provide them with the food they need. … Parents have a primal drive to provide food for their children. But parents are also sensitive and responsive to the social pressures their children face. Kids apply stigma to behaviors that go against norms. Universal free lunch would all but certainly engender a stigma against kids bringing brown lunch bags, crowding out parental food preparation. Would this really be good for parents? Or for children? … Any child naturally inclined to gratitude in the act of eating would not be reflecting on how the love and labor of their parents, working as units within society, brought that food to their plate. Rather, they must contemplate the state as provider. Such reflection must necessarily inform and transform a child’s moral worldview, with human consequences that will evade econometric analysis. … Beyond the taxpayer sticker shock, we should far more carefully consider the moral, social, and potentially biological costs of universal free school lunch.

Share candidate endorsements with us! 

As part of our goal to solve the ballot information problem, Ballotpedia is gathering information about school board candidate endorsements. The ballot information gap widens the further down the ballot you go, and is worst for the more than 500,000 local offices nationwide, such as school boards or special districts. Endorsements can help voters know more about their candidates and what they stand for. 

Do you know of an individual or group that has endorsed a candidate in your district? 

Click here to respond!

School board update: filing deadlines, election results, and recall certifications

Ballotpedia has historically covered school board elections in about 500 of the country’s largest districts. We’re gradually expanding the number we cover with our eye on the more than 13,000 districts with elected school boards.

Election results from the past week


On Aug. 29, residents of the West Bonner County School District voted to recall two school board members—Zone 4 Representative Keith Rutledge and Zone 2 Representative Susan Brown. Rutledge served as the board’s chairman and Brown served as vice chairman. 

Unofficial results from the Bonner County Elections Department showed a 63-37% majority voted in favor of recalling Rutledge, and a 66-34% majority voted in favor of recalling Brown. A majority of voters had to cast ballots in favor of each recall for them to be successful.

Recall supporters initiated the effort after the board voted 3-1 to reject an English Language Arts curriculum it had previously endorsed because of concerns about social-emotional learning.

So far this year, we’ve tracked 219 recall efforts against 325 officials. The efforts against 37 of those officials appeared on the ballot, and 28 were removed from office in recall elections. Recall elections against another 31 officials are scheduled to occur later this year.

We’ll have more on this recall in next week’s edition. 

Upcoming school board elections

New Hampshire

Fourteen seats on the Manchester School District school board in New Hampshire are up for election this year, with a primary scheduled for Sept. 19. The general election is scheduled for Nov. 7. We’ll bring you more about these elections in a future issue. 

November elections

Nov. 7 is the biggest election date of the year, and voters across the country will decide state and local races—including for school boards (subscribe to our Daily Brew newsletter for Ballotpedia’s coverage and analysis of elections up and down the ballot). Throughout the fall, we’ll preview the most interesting and pivotal school board elections happening that day. Let’s step back and take a look at the big picture.

We’re covering school board elections in the following 16 states on Nov. 7:

In seven of those states—Colorado, Kansas, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington—we are covering all school board elections on Nov. 7. We’ll be bringing you detailed coverage of those elections.

Oklahoma State Board of Education votes to upgrade Tulsa Public Schools’ accreditation status following superintendent resignation

On Aug. 24, days after Tulsa Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Deborah Gist announced she would step down from her role, the Oklahoma State Board of Education voted unanimously to upgrade Tulsa Public Schools’ accreditation status to “accredited with deficiencies”—temporarily ending a months-long conflict between the state and Oklahoma’s largest school district.

The six-member board said Tulsa Public Schools has three deficiencies: the submission of untimely reports, a lack of financial transparency, and violating state financial accounting standards. The board comprises Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters (R) and five members appointed by the governor with the consent of the state Senate.

Since taking office in January, Walters has criticized Tulsa Public Schools for low academic performance and financial mismanagement.  

State Department of Education General Counsel Bryan Cleveland said Tulsa Public Schools “has been risking misuse of its finances through a lack of internal controls.” The district is pursuing litigation against its former chief talent and equity officer for allegedly embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars between 2018 and 2021. Gist said “a single late accreditation report and an isolated, self-reported embezzlement incident should not cause the Tulsa Public Schools Board of Education to lose local control over the future of our school district.”

Gist, who became superintendent in 2015, said the district was making progress on student achievement. Gist announced her resignation on Aug. 22, writing “it is no secret that our state superintendent has had an unrelenting focus on our district and specifically on me, and I am confident that my departure will help to keep our democratically-elected leadership and our team in charge of our schools–this week and in the future. So I’m stepping away.” 

Gist said her last day would be Sept. 15. The Tulsa Public Schools Board of Education appointed the district’s chief learning officer as interim superintendent.  

Walters said, “I am optimistic that this is a step in the right direction. I’ve been crystal clear that Tulsa Public Schools needs a dramatic change in leadership.”

In July 2022, the board voted 4-2 to reduce the district’s accreditation status to “accredited with warning” for violating HB 1775. HB 1775, enacted in 2021, prohibits teachers, administrators, and other school staff from teaching ideas that include “an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.” The incident stemmed from a teacher’s complaint that mandatory staff training material contained “statements that specifically shame white people for past offenses in history, and state that all are implicitly racially biased by nature.”

The state board reviews the accreditation status of all districts on an annual basis. That happened for most districts at the board’s July 27 meeting. However, Walters said he wanted to take an additional look at two districts, including Tulsa Public Schools. 

Although the district’s accreditation status improved following the Aug. 24 vote, it must provide monthly in-person reports to the state board detailing its progress in correcting the deficiencies. Walters said, “Tulsa has been given an opportunity to correct themselves. And to be very clear, I will not let this district fail. If they do not fix these problems, I will. The clock is started. There will be accountability.” 

Walters said he would revisit the district’s accreditation status if he didn’t see progress within three to four months. 

Walters first mentioned reviewing the district’s accreditation status at a rally in support of Tulsa Public Schools board member E’Lena Ashley, who faced criticism from other members of the board after leading a prayer during a high school graduation ceremony. Walters said, “At the next board meeting we have next month, we will be looking at Tulsa Public Schools’ accreditation for all their violations, fiscal mismanagement in this district, and we are going to make sure that religious liberties are protected in Tulsa Public Schools.”

In response to the accreditation vote, Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) said, “The things that they asked for are very reasonable, and I was excited the state board voted on those and I think it’s the right thing to do. Now it’s up to the local community and up to the school board and the Tulsa community to improve on their district and so that’s exactly how it should work.”

State Rep. Monroe Nichols (D), whose district includes parts of Tulsa, said, “I don’t know his heart or the hearts of the board members, but I know they have over and over focused on the issue of race, and they just now happen to be threatening to ‘unaccredit’ the school district that educates the most Black kids in the state. There are several other districts whose outcomes are worse than TPS’, and none of them are facing the same consequences.”

Tulsa Public Schools has a student population of around 34,000.

Stay up to date with responses to trends in curriculum development

In addition to covering school board elections and endorsements, we’re also documenting how individuals and groups are responding to some of the biggest education controversies of the day—including the debates over K-12 curriculum.  

Approaches to K-12 curriculum development in public schools vary across states and school districts. State officials, local districts, school leaders, or teachers may each play a role in shaping what students read and learn. State-level content standards—educational learning and achievement goals that state education officials either require or recommend—may also influence curriculum development.

Our article on responses to trends in curriculum development includes stories in the following areas:

For example, here are some recent stories we’ve covered on CRT and CRT-related issues:

  • Tennessee teacher group sues state over law governing instruction on social issues: The Tennessee Education Association filed a lawsuit on July 25 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee challenging a 2021 state law that prohibits teaching “certain concepts about racism, sexism, bias, and other social issues.”
  • Nebraska senator announces hearing date to study the use of CRT in public schools: Nebraska state Sen. Dave Murman (R), chairman of the Nebraska Legislature’s Education Committee, announced the committee would hear testimony on July 31, from Nebraska Department of Education officials, educators, and parents. The hearing was scheduled after the passage of three interim study resolutions (which Murman introduced in May) through which the legislature resolved to study the usage of CRT, social and emotional learning, parental involvement, access to educational materials, and other related issues in public schools.

Here is a recent story on sex education and gender polices:

  • North Carolina lawmakers override governor’s veto on bill banning some sexual education: The North Carolina Legislature voted to override Gov. Roy Cooper’s (D) veto of Senate Bill 49 on Aug. 18. The bill prohibits curriculum on “gender identity, sexual activity, or sexuality” in elementary schools. The bill also requires parental notification before “any changes in the name or pronoun used for a student.”

And here is a recent story on history, civics, and social science curricula:

  • Arkansas Department of Education removes AP African American studies course: On Aug. 11, the Arkansas Department of Education removed the AP African American studies course from schools for the 2023-2024 school year, saying the pilot course may not align with state law. According to Education Week, the state department said it “cannot approve a pilot that may unintentionally put a teacher at risk of violating Arkansas law.”. The College Board introduced the curriculum in 60 schools during the 2022-2023 school year and was set to expand to more schools nationwide in the 2023-2024 school year, including six schools in Arkansas. Florida was the first state to ban the curriculum in January 2023.

Click here to read more about responses to trends in curriculum development. 

Extracurricular: education news from around the web

This section contains links to recent education-related articles from around the internet. If you know of a story we should be reading, reply to this email to share it with us! 

Take our Candidate Connection survey to reach voters in your district

Everyone deserves to know their candidates. However, we know it can be hard for voters to find information about their candidates, especially for local offices such as school boards. That’s why we created Candidate Connection—a survey designed to help candidates tell voters about their campaigns, their issues, and so much more. 

If you’re a school board candidate or incumbent, click here to take the survey. And if you’re not running for school board, but there is an election in your community this year, share the link with the candidates and urge them to take the survey!

The survey contains over 30 questions, and you can choose the ones you feel will best represent your views to voters. If you complete the survey, a box with your answers will display on your Ballotpedia profile. Your responses will also appear in our sample ballot.

In the 2022 election cycle, 6,087 candidates completed the survey.